Let \(X \in \mathbb{R}_+^m\) denote a stock market vector, and let \(\lambda \in \Delta^m\) denote a portfolio. Given a portfolio \(\lambda\), the investor’s one-period wealth is given by
Now consider a sequence of stock market vectors \(\lbrace X_t \rbrace_{t \in [T]}\). The wealth accumulated by a fixed portfolio \(\lambda\) over \(T\) periods is
The \(\mu\)-weighted universal portfolio at time \(t\) is defined as
We may define a distribution \(q_t\) over portfolios as
Under this interpretation, \(W_{t-1}(\lambda)\) plays the role of a likelihood, while \(\mu(\lambda)\) plays the role of a prior distribution.
Indeed, letting
we have
Thus, the universal portfolio \(\bar{\lambda}_t\) can be interpreted as the posterior mean under \(q_t\). From this perspective, universal portfolio selection admits a natural interpretation as a form of online Bayes.
Empirical Bayes
O'Sullivan et al. [1] proposed an adaptive universal portfolio of the form
where \(\alpha_t : (\Delta^m, \lbrace X_j \rbrace_{j \in [t-1]}) \to (0,1)\) is chosen to be a non-decreasing function of the past wealth \(W_{t-1}(\lambda)\).
The factor \(\alpha_t(\lambda)\) can be viewed as inducing a data-dependent prior over portfolios. Consequently, the adaptive universal portfolio \(\tilde{\lambda}_t\) admits an empirical Bayes interpretation: the prior distribution is adapted using the observed market history, and the resulting portfolio is the posterior mean under this data-dependent prior.
I am not yet sure how useful this perspective will be, but I believe it may lead to interesting insights.
References
- [1] O'Sullivan, Patrick, and David Edelman. "Adaptive universal portfolios." The European Journal of Finance 21.4 (2015): 337–351.